Pagan polyamory dating
To remove the sexual specificity from the notion of marriage makes marriage not a realisation of the bodily difference between male and female that protects and dignifies each, but simply a matter of choice.
This is precisely what many pro-revision advocates themselves argue: that a new definition of marriage would establish marriage as a new thing altogether. J Graff puts it, a change in marriage law would mean that marriage would "ever after stand for sexual choice, forcutting the link between sex and diapers".
The passing of the Irish referendum on same-sex marriage has triggered a round of Australian advocates announcing that it is now "our turn".
We lag behind the UK, many European countries, some states in the US, and (perish the thought!
One of them is this: if the Marriage Act changes, this is not the end of the world for me. I am more distressed by our inattention to children in detention, or our national greed problem, than by the possibility that the definition of marriage might be changed.
Another is that I stand adamantly against the bullying and vilification of people of minority sexual identities.
Wisely, our politicians don't listen to surveys on that issue (and I agree with them).
The case has been made almost entirely in terms of "equality" and its alleged opposite: "discrimination".He has said: It's time for our laws to reflect the values of modern Australia and to include everyone as equals ... And these same terms make opposing a redefinition of marriage sound primitive and even barbaric.